Writing Modern Geoscience

Main Article Content

Randolph Williams

Abstract

Scientific writing is a cornerstone component of modern geoscience practice. Despite this, the subject rarely benefits from any explicit instruction during graduate training. This editorial attempts to address that gap by providing a simplified approach to writing modern geoscience papers. Implementation of this approach requires aspiring scientific writers to first consider why we as scientists write papers and what our goals should be for our audience. From there, specific and detailed advice is provided on how to best structure the idea flow and presentation within each of the primary components of a peer-reviewed manuscript (e.g. introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusions, and abstracts). Examples of annotated, illustrative text are provided throughout. Considerable attention is paid to the notion of a scientific paper as an argument (as presented primarily in it's discussion section) in favor of some proposition, and the key aspects of what makes an argument compelling. The goal is to provide new or struggling scientific writers with an explicit mechanism to construct impactful peer-reviewed manuscripts more easily.

Article Details

How to Cite
Williams, R. (2024). Writing Modern Geoscience. τeκτoniκa, 1(2), I-XVII. https://doi.org/10.55575/tektonika2023.1.2.74
Section
Articles

References

Atwater, T. (1970), Implications of plate tectonics for the cenozoic tectonic evolution of western north america, GSA Bulletin, 81(12), 3513–3536, doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1970)81[3513:IOPTFT]2.0.CO;2.

Bateman, K. M., C. G. Wilson, R. T. Williams, B. Tikoff, and T. F. Shipley (2022), Explicit instruction of scientific uncertainty in an undergraduate geoscience Field-Based course, Science education, 31(6), 1541–1566, doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00345-z.

Carminati, E., and C. Chiarabba (2023), Slab damage and the pulsating retreat of the Ionian-Apennines subduction, Geology, 51(3), 227–232, doi: 10.1130/G50676.1.

Connah, G. (2010), Writing about Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511845383.

Gustavii, B. (2017), How to Write and Illustrate a Scientific Paper, Cambridge University Press.

Hansen, D. D., J. P. Brooks, L. K. Zoet, N. T. Stevens, L. Smith, C. E. Bate, and B. J. Jahnke (2023), A power-based abrasion law for use in landscape evolution models, Geology, 51(3), 273–277, doi: 10.1130/G50673.1.

Landes, K. K. (1951), A scrutiny of the abstract, Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 35(7), 1660.

Landes, K. K. (1966), A scrutiny of the abstract, II: GEOLOGICAL NOTES, AAPG Bulletin, 50(9), 1992–1992, doi: 10.1306/5D25B6AF-16C1-11D7-8645000102C1865D.

Lowman, P. D. (1988), The abstract rescrutinized, Geology, 16(12), 1063–1063, doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016<1063:TAR>2.3.CO;2.

Moreira, H., A. Buzenchi, C. J. Hawkesworth, and B. Dhuime (2023), Plumbing the depths of magma crystallization using 176Lu/177Hf in zircon as a pressure proxy, Geology, 51(3), 233–237, doi: 10.1130/G50659.1.

Phillips, N. J., and R. T. Williams (2021), To D or not to d? re-evaluating particle-size distributions in natural and experimental fault rocks, Earth and planetary science letters, 553, 116,635, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116635.

Roberts, N. M., and B. Tikoff (2021), Internal structure of the paleoarchean mt edgar dome, pilbara craton, western australia, Precambrian research, 358, 106,163, doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106163.

Scharer, K. M., G. P. Biasi, and R. J. Weldon, II (2011), A reevaluation of the pallett creek earthquake chronology based on new AMS radiocarbon dates, san andreas fault, california, Journal of geophysical research, 116(B12), doi: 10.1029/2010jb008099.

Schimel, J. (2012), Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded, Oxford University Press, USA.

Strunk, W., and E. B. White (2000), The elements of style, Longman, New York.

Titus, S. J., M. Dyson, C. DeMets, B. Tikoff, F. Rolandone, and R. Bürgmann (2011), Geologic versus geodetic deformation adjacent to the san andreas fault, central california, GSA Bulletin, 123(5-6), 794–820, doi: 10.1130/B30150.1.

Williams, R. T. (2019), Coseismic boiling cannot seal faults: Implications for the seismic cycle, Geology, 47(5), 461–464, doi: 10.1130/G45936.1.

Williams, R. T., and J. D. Kirkpatrick (2022), Are low-frequency earthquake moments area- or slip-limited? a rock record examination, Geophysical research letters, 49(2), doi: 10.1029/2021gl095759.

Williams, R. T., L. B. Goodwin, and P. S. Mozley (2017a), Diagenetic controls on the evolution of fault-zone architecture and permeability structure: Implications for episodicity of fault-zone fluid transport in extensional basins, GSA Bulletin, 129(3-4), 464–478, doi: 10.1130/B31443.1.

Williams, R. T., L. B. Goodwin, W. D. Sharp, and P. S. Mozley (2017b), Reading a 400,000-year record of earthquake frequency for an intraplate fault, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(19), 4893–4898, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617945114.

Williams, R. T., P. S. Mozley, W. D. Sharp, and L. B. Goodwin (2019), U-Th dating of syntectonic calcite veins reveals the dynamic nature of fracture cementation and healing in faults, Geophysical research letters, 46(22), 12,900–12,908, doi: 10.1029/2019gl085403.

Williams, R. T., C. D. Rowe, K. Okamoto, H. M. Savage, and E. Eves (2021), How fault rocks form and evolve in the shallow san andreas fault, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 22(11), doi: 10.1029/2021gc010092.